![]() |
![]() |
| HOME | Mortgage Reporting | Collection Services | Contact Us | Brochures | Links |
|
Current Newsletter Early Intervention Tools Full Service Contingency Collection Purchase of Receivables Accounts Receivable Consulting Mortgages & Public Record Bulletin Seminars Training When to Use Rate Structure Becoming a Client |
March 2000 NewsletterYour Money MattersWhy you won't like the new banking lawBy Robert K. Heady, Your Money contributing editor and founding president of Bank Rate Monitor. Better batten down the hatches. Your personal financial life is about to become one big, complicated, confusing jungle because of a new federal law passed last November. After 5 years of intensive lobbying by banks, securities firms, and insurance companies, the government is allowing these institutions to get into each other's businesses. This means you'll undoubtedly see a slew of giant financial mergers beginning in late spring. Risky Investments Inc. might buy Friendly Federal Bank and tempt you with uninsured stocks when you go in to buy an FDIC-insured CD. Friendly Federal Bank will be able to check your health records at its Ace Insurance Co. affiliate when it reviews your loan application. Plus, all three outfits will have access to your most personal data, including your name, address, phone number, salary, account balance, and credit history. Scary? You bet. The Financial Services Modernization Act, as the law is called, has been blasted by consumer advocates as pushing the United States back to the late 1920s, when there was no separation between risky investment banking and bank accounts that protected the consumer's money. That set off a stock-buying frenzy that culminated in the crash of 1929. Then, for years after, the Glass-Steagall Act separated the nation's financial services-until now. Why the new banking reform law? Banks' share of consumer assets has fallen sharply from 40% in 1980 to only 25% last year. The banking industry promises that the law will create more competition, offer one-stop shopping convenience, lead to lower prices, and save consumers $15 billion a year in fees. Not so, say consumer activists. They argue that the average person will have fewer choices and actually pay higher fees-just as the nation's biggest banks today charge higher fees than smaller institutions. They fear people will be denied credit or insurance because of the way the big new conglomerates will share customers' financial data. And with securities and bank accounts under the same roof, consumers may be touted into buying risky investments that aren't safe. The new law is a disaster to the average American's personal privacy, according to many experts and several congressmen who fought the bill unsuccessfully. Sen. Paul Wellstone (D.-Minn.) termed it "bad legislation that we as a nation will soon regret." One thing is for sure: The law is fraught with complexities and loopholes that favor the financial interests, not the consumer. Here's some of what you're up against, in a nutshell:
The new law left some leeway on privacy up to the individual states. If you're concerned, consider calling or writing your state legislators, urging them to enact privacy protection for your state. Your Money, February/March 2000 Surviving the Tax Crunch
|
Newsletter
|
| Back to Top ^ |
|
|
Ann Arbor Credit Bureau, Inc.
|
||